Related work, side by side

Comparisons

Three head-to-head pages, each governed by the same rule: the other side stated at its true strength, prior work credited first, the programme's own maturity declared without flattery, and the measurement that would decide named. No page here declares a winner, because the deciding evidence does not exist yet.

Embedded correction vs evaluation-based alignment

The field's standard build-then-examine approach against the proposal that correction must live inside the recursive loop. One has scale without a proof of sufficiency; the other has a measurement design without scale.

The Eden Protocol vs Constitutional AI

Each is described by what its own text states. Constitutional AI trains values into behaviour; Eden proposes entangling care with capability itself and is at pilot scale in one laboratory. Prior work credited first.

Independent vs institutional alignment research

Not a superiority claim: a structural comparison of which experiments are cheap from which position, what independence buys, and exactly what it costs.

Corrections and missed prior work are actively invited; the prior work page names the intake path. Every claim on these pages traces to the registers.

Sources: the prior work register; the open problem page; the evidence spine.